Skip to main content
LCA Talents Hub
Back to the specialist profile

รศ.ดร.ธภัทร ศิลาเลิศรักษา

All publications

78 public publications

Page size102550

Developing REDD+ strategies in Thailand: A case study of drivers of deforestation, forest degradation and possible countermeasures in the Phu Wiang National Park (PWNP) area, Khon Kaen Province

Jintana Kawasaki, Adcharaporn Pagdee, Thapat Silalertruksa, Doungjai Waijaroen, Salila Iamittipon, Poirada Phumee

2015

Water Footprint and Impact of Water Consumption for Food, Feed, Fuel Crops Production in Thailand

Shabbir H. Gheewala, Thapat Silalertruksa, Pariyapat Nilsalab, Rattanawan Mungkung, Sylvain Perret, Nuttapon Chaiyawannakarn

Water · 2014

The proliferation of food, feed and biofuels demands promises to increase pressure on water competition and stress, particularly for Thailand, which has a large agricultural base. This study assesses the water footprint of ten staple crops grown in different regions across the country and evaluates the impact of crop water use in different regions/watersheds by the water stress index and the indication of water deprivation potential. The ten crops include major rice, second rice, maize, soybean, mungbean, peanut, cassava, sugarcane, pineapple and oil palm. The water stress index of the 25 major watersheds in Thailand has been evaluated. The results show that there are high variations of crop water requirements grown in different regions due to many factors. However, based on the current cropping systems, the Northeastern region has the highest water requirement for both green water (or rain water) and blue water (or irrigation water). Rice (paddy) farming requires the highest amount of irrigation water, i.e., around 10,489 million m3/year followed by the maize, sugarcane, oil palm and cassava. Major rice cultivation induces the highest water deprivation, i.e., 1862 million m3H2Oeq/year; followed by sugarcane, second rice and cassava. The watersheds that have high risk on water competition due to increase in production of the ten crops considered are the Mun, Chi and Chao Phraya watersheds. The main contribution is from the second rice cultivation. Recommendations have been proposed for sustainable crops production in the future.

Life cycle cost of biodiesel production from microalgae in Thailand

Wanchat Sawaengsak, Thapat Silalertruksa, Athikom Bangviwat, Shabbir H. Gheewala

Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development · 2014

Towards a comprehensive methodology to assess biofuels production as a climate change mitigation action: Climate Benefits and Environmental and Socio‐Economic Implications of Biofuels production in Thailand

Jintana Kawasaki, Thapat Silalertruksa, Henry Scheyvens, Makino Yamanoshita, Taiji Fujisaki

2014

A comparative LCA of rice straw utilization for fuels and fertilizer in Thailand

Thapat Silalertruksa, Shabbir H. Gheewala

Bioresource Technology · 2013

Implications of the biofuels policy mandate in Thailand on water: The case of bioethanol

Shabbir H. Gheewala, Thapat Silalertruksa, Pariyapat Nilsalab, Rattanawan Mungkung, Sylvain Perret, Nuttapon Chaiyawannakarn

Bioresource Technology · 2013

Life cycle GHG analysis of rice straw bio-DME production and application in Thailand

Thapat Silalertruksa, Shabbir H. Gheewala, Masayuki Sagisaka, Katsunobu Yamaguchi

Applied Energy · 2013

Sustainability Assessment of Palm Biodiesel Production in Thailand

Thapat Silalertruksa, Shabbir H. Gheewala

2013

Biofuels and employment effects: Implications for socio-economic development in Thailand

Thapat Silalertruksa, Shabbir H. Gheewala, Katja Hünecke, Uwe R. Fritsche

Biomass and Bioenergy · 2012

Food, Fuel, and Climate Change

Thapat Silalertruksa, Shabbir H. Gheewala

Journal of Industrial Ecology · 2012

Page 7 of 8

Analytics cookies

This site uses Google Analytics to see aggregate usage — visitor counts and which pages get attention. It only runs if you accept.

No choice made yet